1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2011 Mazda 3
To start off, 2011 Mazda 3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda 3 weights approximately 117 kg more than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2011 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Mazda |
| Model | Sprite | 3 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1297 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 55 L |
