1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2011 Tata Nano
To start off, 2011 Tata Nano is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2011 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Tata |
| Model | Sprite | Nano |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 37 L |
