1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2012 Mazda 6
To start off, 2012 Mazda 6 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 6 weights approximately 441 kg more than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2012 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mazda |
Model | Sprite | 6 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 272 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1621 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1795 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 70 L |