1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2012 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2012 Toyota Tundra is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2012 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Toyota |
Model | Sprite | Tundra |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 5663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 381 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 100 L |