1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 571 kg more than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Cadillac |
Model | Sprite | CTS |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 266 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 11.7 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1751 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 68 L |