1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE
To start off, 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE weights approximately 442 kg more than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Chrysler |
Model | Sprite | 200 CONVERTIBLE |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 279 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1622 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 2121 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2765 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 64 L |