1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2013 Ford F-150
To start off, 2013 Ford F-150 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford F-150 weights approximately 945 kg more than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2013 Ford F-150 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
| Model | Sprite | F-150 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 298 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5415 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 2624 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 98 L |
