1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2013 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2013 Toyota Highlander is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 929 kg more than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 2013 Toyota Highlander is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Highlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2013 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Toyota |
Model | Sprite | Highlander |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 228 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 2109 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4795 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 65 L |