1966 Autobianchi Bianchina vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1982 Zastava 102 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Autobianchi Bianchina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Autobianchi Bianchina would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Zastava 102 (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1966 Autobianchi Bianchina. (22 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1966 Autobianchi Bianchina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Zastava 102 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1966 Autobianchi Bianchina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Autobianchi Bianchina. (35 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1982 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Autobianchi Bianchina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Autobianchi Bianchina | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Zastava |
| Model | Bianchina | 102 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 498 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 22 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 35 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 500 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2160 mm |
