1966 Autobianchi Primula vs. 2009 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2009 Fiat Bravo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Autobianchi Primula. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Autobianchi Primula would be higher. At 1,908 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Fiat Bravo (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1966 Autobianchi Primula. (57 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1966 Autobianchi Primula. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 605 kg more than 1966 Autobianchi Primula. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Autobianchi Primula | 2009 Fiat Bravo | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Fiat |
| Model | Primula | Bravo |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1221 cc | 1908 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 17.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 1435 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 58 L |
