1966 Autobianchi Primula vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Autobianchi Primula. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Autobianchi Primula would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1966 Autobianchi Primula. (57 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1966 Autobianchi Primula. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 499 kg more than 1966 Autobianchi Primula. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Autobianchi Primula | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Mazda |
| Model | Primula | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1221 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 273 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 10.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 1329 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 76 L |
