1966 Autobianchi Primula vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Autobianchi Primula. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Autobianchi Primula would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (179 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1966 Autobianchi Primula. (57 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1966 Autobianchi Primula. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 770 kg more than 1966 Autobianchi Primula. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Autobianchi Primula | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Autobianchi | Cadillac |
Model | Primula | BLS |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1221 cc | 1910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 58 L |