1966 Autobianchi Primula vs. 2010 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Autobianchi Primula. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Autobianchi Primula would be higher. At 2,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Epica (154 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1966 Autobianchi Primula. (57 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1966 Autobianchi Primula. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 745 kg more than 1966 Autobianchi Primula. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Autobianchi Primula | 2010 Chevrolet Epica | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Chevrolet |
| Model | Primula | Epica |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1221 cc | 2490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 63 L |
