1966 Autobianchi Primula vs. 2012 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Autobianchi Primula. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Autobianchi Primula would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro (323 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 1966 Autobianchi Primula. (57 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1966 Autobianchi Primula. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 885 kg more than 1966 Autobianchi Primula. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Autobianchi Primula | 2012 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Autobianchi | Chevrolet |
Model | Primula | Camaro |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1221 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 323 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 72 L |