1966 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 1963 Riley 4
To start off, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Riley 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Riley 4 would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP) has 294 more horse power than 1963 Riley 4. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 1963 Riley 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Bizzarrini A3C weights approximately 112 kg more than 1963 Riley 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 389 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Riley 4. (121 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1966 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Riley 4.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Bizzarrini A3C | 1963 Riley 4 | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Riley |
Model | A3C | 4 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 5353 cc | 1622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1148 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2530 mm |