1966 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 1965 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1965 Ford Mustang. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Bizzarrini A3C weights approximately 144 kg more than 1965 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Bizzarrini A3C | 1965 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Ford |
Model | A3C | Mustang |
Year Released | 1966 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 5353 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2750 mm |