1966 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1968 Triumph 2000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Bizzarrini A3C weights approximately 90 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 352 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Bizzarrini A3C | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Triumph |
Model | A3C | 2000 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 5353 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2700 mm |