1966 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 1976 Volvo 240
To start off, 1976 Volvo 240 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 280 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 240. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Volvo 240 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1966 Bizzarrini A3C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 240. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1966 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Bizzarrini A3C | 1976 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Volvo |
Model | A3C | 240 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1976 |
Engine Size | 5353 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2650 mm |