1966 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 1978 Lotus 79
To start off, 1978 Lotus 79 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Lotus 79 (484 HP @ 11000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Lotus 79 should accelerate faster than 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Bizzarrini A3C weights approximately 670 kg more than 1978 Lotus 79.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Bizzarrini A3C | 1978 Lotus 79 | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Lotus |
| Model | A3C | 79 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1978 |
| Engine Size | 5353 cc | 2992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 484 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 11000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 590 kg |
