1966 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 1980 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1980 Ford Falcon is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 1980 Ford Falcon. (109 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 1980 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Ford Falcon weights approximately 110 kg more than 1966 Bizzarrini A3C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Ford Falcon. (228 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1966 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Bizzarrini A3C | 1980 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Ford |
| Model | A3C | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 5353 cc | 3273 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 228 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2830 mm |
