1966 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 1987 Holden Astra

To start off, 1987 Holden Astra is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP) has 291 more horse power than 1987 Holden Astra. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 1987 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Bizzarrini A3C weights approximately 405 kg more than 1987 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Holden Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 395 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Holden Astra. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1966 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Holden Astra.

Compare all specifications: