1966 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 1993 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 1993 Jaguar XJ is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,993 cc (12 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1993 Jaguar XJ. (318 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 1993 Jaguar XJ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Jaguar XJ. (464 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1966 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Jaguar XJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Bizzarrini A3C | 1993 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Jaguar |
| Model | A3C | XJ |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1993 |
| Engine Size | 5353 cc | 5993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 318 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 464 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2880 mm |
