1966 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 1995 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1995 Ford Mustang is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1995 Ford Mustang. (143 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Mustang weights approximately 130 kg more than 1966 Bizzarrini A3C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Mustang. (298 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1966 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Bizzarrini A3C | 1995 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Ford |
Model | A3C | Mustang |
Year Released | 1966 | 1995 |
Engine Size | 5353 cc | 3797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 298 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2580 mm |