1966 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 1996 Mercury Villager
To start off, 1996 Mercury Villager is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1996 Mercury Villager. (149 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 1996 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Villager weights approximately 540 kg more than 1966 Bizzarrini A3C.
Because 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Bizzarrini A3C | 1996 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Mercury |
Model | A3C | Villager |
Year Released | 1966 | 1996 |
Engine Size | 5353 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2860 mm |