1966 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. (510 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Bizzarrini A3C.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Bizzarrini A3C | 2000 Holden HRT | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Holden |
Model | A3C | HRT |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 5353 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 815 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |