1966 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2001 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2001 Lincoln LS is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 2001 Lincoln LS. (210 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2001 Lincoln LS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lincoln LS weights approximately 427 kg more than 1966 Bizzarrini A3C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lincoln LS. (278 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1966 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lincoln LS.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Bizzarrini A3C | 2001 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Lincoln |
Model | A3C | LS |
Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
Engine Size | 5353 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 278 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2910 mm |