1966 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2001 Opel Astra

To start off, 2001 Opel Astra is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 2001 Opel Astra. (142 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2001 Opel Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Bizzarrini A3C weights approximately 80 kg more than 2001 Opel Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Opel Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Opel Astra. (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1966 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Opel Astra. 2001 Opel Astra has automatic transmission and 1966 Bizzarrini A3C has manual transmission. 1966 Bizzarrini A3C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Opel Astra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: