1966 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP) has 41 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. (320 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 240 kg more than 1966 Bizzarrini A3C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. (454 Nm). This means 1966 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Bizzarrini A3C | 2002 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Chevrolet |
| Model | A3C | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 5353 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 320 HP |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 454 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2570 mm |
