1966 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2002 Volvo S60. (208 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2002 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo S60 weights approximately 500 kg more than 1966 Bizzarrini A3C.
Because 2002 Volvo S60 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Volvo S60. (407 Nm). This means 1966 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Volvo S60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Bizzarrini A3C | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Volvo |
| Model | A3C | S60 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 5353 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2720 mm |
