1966 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2003 Ford F-250
To start off, 2003 Ford F-250 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2003 Ford F-250. (296 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford F-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford F-250 weights approximately 1150 kg more than 1966 Bizzarrini A3C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford F-250. (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1966 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford F-250.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Bizzarrini A3C | 2003 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Ford |
Model | A3C | F-250 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 5353 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 495 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 2410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 5760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3490 mm |