1966 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP) has 79 more horse power than 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. (282 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1180 kg more than 1966 Bizzarrini A3C.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. (441 Nm). This means 1966 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Bizzarrini A3C | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Land Rover |
| Model | A3C | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 5353 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 282 HP |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2890 mm |
