1966 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2005 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP) has 129 more horse power than 2005 Lincoln LS. (232 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2005 Lincoln LS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 427 kg more than 1966 Bizzarrini A3C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Lincoln LS. (298 Nm). This means 1966 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Lincoln LS.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Bizzarrini A3C | 2005 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Lincoln |
Model | A3C | LS |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 5353 cc | 2964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 232 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 298 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3020 mm |