1966 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2012 Holden Epica

To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP) has 213 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.

Because 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 1966 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica. 2012 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1966 Bizzarrini A3C has manual transmission. 1966 Bizzarrini A3C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: