1966 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 2012 Mazda BT-50. (154 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda BT-50.
Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda BT-50. (380 Nm @ 180 RPM). This means 1966 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda BT-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Bizzarrini A3C | 2012 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Bizzarrini | Mazda |
| Model | A3C | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 5353 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 361 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 180 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3010 mm |
