1966 Bizzarrini A3C vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz B
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz B is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,353 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 253 more horse power than 2012 Mercedes-Benz B. (108 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2012 Mercedes-Benz B.
Because 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz B, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mercedes-Benz B. (250 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1966 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mercedes-Benz B.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Bizzarrini A3C | 2012 Mercedes-Benz B | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | A3C | B |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 5353 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 361 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4359 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1557 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2699 mm |