1966 Bizzarrini GT vs. 2002 MCC Smart
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini GT would be higher. At 1,895 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Bizzarrini GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Bizzarrini GT (108 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2002 MCC Smart. (80 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bizzarrini GT should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MCC Smart weights approximately 136 kg more than 1966 Bizzarrini GT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bizzarrini GT (157 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Smart. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Bizzarrini GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Bizzarrini GT | 2002 MCC Smart | |
Make | Bizzarrini | MCC |
Model | GT | Smart |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1895 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 80 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 816 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2370 mm |