1966 Bizzarrini GT vs. 2004 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini GT would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 282 more horse power than 1966 Bizzarrini GT. (108 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1966 Bizzarrini GT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 1078 kg more than 1966 Bizzarrini GT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (525 Nm) has 368 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Bizzarrini GT. (157 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Bizzarrini GT.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Bizzarrini GT | 2004 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Jaguar |
Model | GT | XK |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1895 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 525 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1758 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2590 mm |