1966 Bizzarrini GT vs. 2005 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XK is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini GT would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1966 Bizzarrini GT. (108 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1966 Bizzarrini GT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XK weights approximately 1034 kg more than 1966 Bizzarrini GT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Bizzarrini GT. (157 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Bizzarrini GT.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Bizzarrini GT | 2005 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Jaguar |
Model | GT | XK |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1895 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 294 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 411 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1714 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2590 mm |