1966 Bizzarrini GT vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini GT would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 163 more horse power than 1966 Bizzarrini GT. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1966 Bizzarrini GT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 443 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Bizzarrini GT. (157 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Bizzarrini GT. 2011 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1966 Bizzarrini GT has manual transmission. 1966 Bizzarrini GT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Bizzarrini GT | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Bizzarrini | Jaguar |
Model | GT | XF |
Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1895 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 600 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2908 mm |