1966 BMW 1600 vs. 1959 Saab 92
To start off, 1966 BMW 1600 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,574 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 BMW 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 BMW 1600 weights approximately 115 kg more than 1959 Saab 92.
Because 1966 BMW 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 BMW 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 BMW 1600 | 1959 Saab 92 | |
| Make | BMW | Saab |
| Model | 1600 | 92 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1574 cc | 764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2480 mm |
