1966 BMW 1600 vs. 1979 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 1,574 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 BMW 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 BMW 1600 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1979 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1966 BMW 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 BMW 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 BMW 1600 | 1979 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | BMW | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 1600 | Colt |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1574 cc | 1244 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2310 mm |
