1966 BMW 1600 vs. 1984 Plymouth Caravelle

To start off, 1984 Plymouth Caravelle is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Plymouth Caravelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Plymouth Caravelle (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1966 BMW 1600. (85 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Plymouth Caravelle should accelerate faster than 1966 BMW 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Plymouth Caravelle weights approximately 315 kg more than 1966 BMW 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 BMW 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 BMW 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Plymouth Caravelle, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Plymouth Caravelle (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 BMW 1600. (124 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1984 Plymouth Caravelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 BMW 1600.

Compare all specifications: