1966 BMW 1600 vs. 1987 Buick Skyhawk
To start off, 1987 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Buick Skyhawk (90 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1966 BMW 1600. (85 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1966 BMW 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 160 kg more than 1966 BMW 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 BMW 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 BMW 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 BMW 1600 | 1987 Buick Skyhawk | |
| Make | BMW | Buick |
| Model | 1600 | Skyhawk |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1574 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2580 mm |
