1966 BMW 1600 vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 1,574 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 BMW 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1966 BMW 1600. (85 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1966 BMW 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 BMW 1600 weights approximately 480 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 BMW 1600 | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | BMW | Westfield |
| Model | 1600 | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 1574 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2320 mm |
