1966 BMW 1600 vs. 2009 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 1600 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1966 BMW 1600. (85 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1966 BMW 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Ram (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 BMW 1600. (124 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 BMW 1600.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 1600 | 2009 Dodge Ram | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | 1600 | Ram |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1574 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 88.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 100 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 98 L |