1966 BMW 1602 vs. 1947 Talbot T 26
To start off, 1966 BMW 1602 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,481 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1947 Talbot T 26 (168 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1966 BMW 1602. (83 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1947 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 1966 BMW 1602. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 660 kg more than 1966 BMW 1602. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 BMW 1602 | 1947 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | BMW | Talbot |
| Model | 1602 | T 26 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1947 |
| Engine Size | 1574 cc | 4481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3130 mm |
