1966 BMW 1602 vs. 1948 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1966 BMW 1602 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,674 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 930 kg more than 1966 BMW 1602.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 1602 | 1948 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 1602 | 62 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1574 cc | 5674 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1870 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3210 mm |