1966 BMW 1602 vs. 1956 Holden FE
To start off, 1966 BMW 1602 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Holden FE would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Holden FE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 BMW 1602 (83 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1956 Holden FE. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 BMW 1602 should accelerate faster than 1956 Holden FE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Holden FE weights approximately 40 kg more than 1966 BMW 1602.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Holden FE (151 Nm @ 1200 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 BMW 1602. (130 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1956 Holden FE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 BMW 1602.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 1602 | 1956 Holden FE | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 1602 | FE |
Year Released | 1966 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1574 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2670 mm |