1966 BMW 1602 vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1967 Nissan Cedric is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 1602. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 1602 would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 BMW 1602 (83 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 BMW 1602 should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 380 kg more than 1966 BMW 1602.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Cedric (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 BMW 1602. (130 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 BMW 1602.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 BMW 1602 | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | BMW | Nissan |
| Model | 1602 | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1574 cc | 2164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 130 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2700 mm |
