1966 BMW 1602 vs. 1979 Mazda 929
To start off, 1979 Mazda 929 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 1602. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 1602 would be higher. At 1,767 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 83 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Mazda 929 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1966 BMW 1602.
Let's talk about torque, 1979 Mazda 929 (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 BMW 1602. (130 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1979 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 BMW 1602.
Compare all specifications:
1966 BMW 1602 | 1979 Mazda 929 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 1602 | 929 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1574 cc | 1767 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 8.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 55 L |